Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Randy J. LarsenEd Diener
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(87)90023-7 →Countries where authors are citing Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review
This map shows the geographic impact of Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review
This network shows the impact of Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review.
About Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review
This paper, published in 1987, received 894 indexed citations . Written by Randy J. Larsen and Ed Diener covering the research area of Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (374 citations), Clinical Psychology (364 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (342 citations), Sociology and Political Science (153 citations) and Applied Psychology (147 citations). Published in Journal of Research in Personality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(87)90023-7.