Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats
Impact in
- Ecology 279
Classified as
- Authors
- William F. LauranceEric Yensen
- Journal
- Biological Conservation
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(91)90006-u →Countries where authors are citing Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats
This map shows the geographic impact of Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats
This network shows the impact of Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats.
About Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats
This paper, published in 1991, received 576 indexed citations . Written by William F. Laurance and Eric Yensen covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (373 citations), Ecology (279 citations), Global and Planetary Change (194 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (148 citations) and Insect Science (75 citations). Published in Biological Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(91)90006-u.