Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability
Impact in
- Communication 128
Classified as
- Journal
- Political Behavior
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x →Countries where authors are citing Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability
This map shows the geographic impact of Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability
This network shows the impact of Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability.
About Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability
This paper, published in 2019, received 263 indexed citations . Written by Brendan Nyhan, Ethan Porter, Jason Reifler and Thomas Wood covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (234 citations), Communication (128 citations), Artificial Intelligence (94 citations), Political Science and International Relations (24 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (21 citations). Published in Political Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x.