When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions

2.0k indexed citations
published 2010

Countries where authors are citing When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions more than expected).

Fields of papers citing When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions.

About When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions

This paper, published in 2010, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by Brendan J Nyhan and Jason Reifler covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (1.6k citations), Communication (794 citations), Political Science and International Relations (387 citations), Artificial Intelligence (331 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (167 citations). Published in Political Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact