Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis
Impact in
- Physiology 151
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/s00018-017-2509-x →Countries where authors are citing Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis
This map shows the geographic impact of Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis
This network shows the impact of Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis.
About Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis
This paper, published in 2017, received 595 indexed citations . Written by Gisela Adrienne Weiss and Thierry Hennet covering the research area of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology and Physiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (350 citations), Physiology (151 citations), Infectious Diseases (73 citations), Gastroenterology (55 citations) and Epidemiology (55 citations). Published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/s00018-017-2509-x.