Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution
Impact in
- Media Technology 1.4k
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_43 →Countries where authors are citing Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution
This map shows the geographic impact of Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution
This network shows the impact of Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution.
About Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution
This paper, published in 2016, received 7.0k indexed citations . Written by Justin M. Johnson, Alexandre Alahi and Li Fei-Fei covering the research area of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (6.0k citations), Media Technology (1.4k citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (742 citations), Artificial Intelligence (676 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (457 citations). Published in Lecture notes in computer science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_43.