Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III
Impact in
- Oncology 270
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650100517 →Countries where authors are citing Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III
This map shows the geographic impact of Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III
This network shows the impact of Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III.
About Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III
This paper, published in 1995, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Anne C. Looker, C. Conrad Johnston, Heinz W. Wahner, William L. Dunn, Mona S. Calvo, Tamara B. Harris, Stephen P. Heyse and Robert Lindsay covering the research area of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery and Physiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (825 citations), Oncology (270 citations), Surgery (243 citations), Molecular Biology (197 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (123 citations). Published in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650100517.